Black High Tops
Monday, February 18, 2019
Blog #3 - Free Write!
Alright, it's your turn to choose your own topic.
For Blog #3, you may write about anything that's been on your mind lately. You could fantasize about your upcoming Spring Break. Tell us about your hometown. Recount a concert you've attended. Make a plan to break a bad habit or start a good one. Describe your pets. Defend Northgate as a healthy place to build friendship. Share wisdom given to you by a mentor or family member. Declare to everyone how much you love Mr. Still's class. You decide!
The only requirements that I have:
- You must meet a 500 word minimum.
- You must announce your topic and what you intend to say about that topic in the first sentence.
- You must have more than one paragraph.
- You must include a photograph (appropriate for class of course). I don't care if the photo was taken by you or if it is from the internet.
Your Rough Draft will be due - on eCampus and printed - at the beginning of class Wednesday, February 20. We will Peer Review in lab Wednesday.
Wednesday, February 6, 2019
Blog #2 - BALANCING VOICES (INCLUDING OUR OWN)
READers,
Here we are, still at the beginning our big project of the semester. My hope is that you will grow as writers (through the use of the writing process) while gaining community with one another along the way.
For Blog #2, you will practice text reference, professional writing, audience consideration, and approaching a prompt with high standards. You will need to reference either David Brooks' "Building Attention Span" or Charles Blow's "Library Visit, Then Held at Gun Point" for this assignment.
So what will you write for Blog #2?
Choose one of the following prompts listed below. Here's the topics you may choose from:
1. Which writer - Brooks or Blow - is more successful in delivering his thesis statement? For the writer you chose, list and explain THREE THINGS the author does in his text that makes him so successful. (NOTICE: I'm not asking which author you like more. That's a different question.)
2. Between the two authors, do you fundamentally disagree with one of the authors? Explore in detail the ideas from either Brooks or Blow that you find especially short sighted. Explain how you believe they should change their ideas and why.
3. How does David Brooks' ideas about the benefits of nurturing crystallized intelligence apply to your first month of the Spring 2019 semester thus far? Be specific. Find three connections.
BE SURE TO CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING REQUIREMENTS:
- Your text must include quotations from the articles or book chapter you are referencing.
- You need a minimum (meaning no less than) 400 words for this first blog post. That is not very many. You may exceed (or go over) 400 words, but if your blog post has less than 400 words you will receive zero credit.
- You must attempt to utilize a professional, formal, academic voice in your writing. This is one skill we will practice this semester. Do not use text lingo or abbreviations. Do not use slang or swear or racially charged language. In fact, HERE'S A LINK TO BLINN WRITING CENTER HANDOUT regarding Formal Academic Voice.
- You should submit a Rough Draft of Blog #2 to the appropriately labeled eCampus Dropbox by no later than midnight, Sunday, February 10. You should also bring a printed copy of your Rough Draft to class on Monday. We will Peer Review and Revise in lab. (Failure to not submit on time will result in a deduction in credit for your overall Blog #1 grade.) We will officially post our Blog #2 entries online later in the week.
You have my Office Hours as well as the Blinn Writing Center to consult for assistance.
I look forward to reading your Rough Drafts soon.
- Kevin Still
Here we are, still at the beginning our big project of the semester. My hope is that you will grow as writers (through the use of the writing process) while gaining community with one another along the way.
For Blog #2, you will practice text reference, professional writing, audience consideration, and approaching a prompt with high standards. You will need to reference either David Brooks' "Building Attention Span" or Charles Blow's "Library Visit, Then Held at Gun Point" for this assignment.
So what will you write for Blog #2?
Choose one of the following prompts listed below. Here's the topics you may choose from:
1. Which writer - Brooks or Blow - is more successful in delivering his thesis statement? For the writer you chose, list and explain THREE THINGS the author does in his text that makes him so successful. (NOTICE: I'm not asking which author you like more. That's a different question.)
2. Between the two authors, do you fundamentally disagree with one of the authors? Explore in detail the ideas from either Brooks or Blow that you find especially short sighted. Explain how you believe they should change their ideas and why.
3. How does David Brooks' ideas about the benefits of nurturing crystallized intelligence apply to your first month of the Spring 2019 semester thus far? Be specific. Find three connections.
BE SURE TO CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING REQUIREMENTS:
- Your text must include quotations from the articles or book chapter you are referencing.
- You need a minimum (meaning no less than) 400 words for this first blog post. That is not very many. You may exceed (or go over) 400 words, but if your blog post has less than 400 words you will receive zero credit.
- You must attempt to utilize a professional, formal, academic voice in your writing. This is one skill we will practice this semester. Do not use text lingo or abbreviations. Do not use slang or swear or racially charged language. In fact, HERE'S A LINK TO BLINN WRITING CENTER HANDOUT regarding Formal Academic Voice.
- You should submit a Rough Draft of Blog #2 to the appropriately labeled eCampus Dropbox by no later than midnight, Sunday, February 10. You should also bring a printed copy of your Rough Draft to class on Monday. We will Peer Review and Revise in lab. (Failure to not submit on time will result in a deduction in credit for your overall Blog #1 grade.) We will officially post our Blog #2 entries online later in the week.
You have my Office Hours as well as the Blinn Writing Center to consult for assistance.
I look forward to reading your Rough Drafts soon.
- Kevin Still
Monday, January 28, 2019
SPRING 2019 Blog #1 - Class Introduction
READers,
Welcome to Blogging in READ 0304! Let's just dive right on in and get busy building a Rough Draft.
For Blog #1, simply introduce yourself to the class. Who are you? Where are you from? Where is that and what should be know about that place? Who are the important people (or animals) in your life? What are you goals for Blinn and beyond? What things are you particularly good at doing? What your hobbies? What's something that would totally surprise us about you? (NOTE: You do not need to answer all these questions. The questions are here to help you think about introduction type ideas.)
This is pretty standard stuff. Let's make this a good piece. Here's the particulars:
- Minimum 500 words
- Rough Draft electronically submitted to eCampus Dropbox by midnight tomorrow, Tuesday, January 29
- Rough Draft physically submitted to Mr. Still at the beginning of our exam in class on Wednesday.
- We will perform a peer review in lab on Wednesday.
- You will submit your Final Draft online by Friday.
Let me know how I can help you.
- Kevin Still
Welcome to Blogging in READ 0304! Let's just dive right on in and get busy building a Rough Draft.
For Blog #1, simply introduce yourself to the class. Who are you? Where are you from? Where is that and what should be know about that place? Who are the important people (or animals) in your life? What are you goals for Blinn and beyond? What things are you particularly good at doing? What your hobbies? What's something that would totally surprise us about you? (NOTE: You do not need to answer all these questions. The questions are here to help you think about introduction type ideas.)
This is pretty standard stuff. Let's make this a good piece. Here's the particulars:
- Minimum 500 words
- Rough Draft electronically submitted to eCampus Dropbox by midnight tomorrow, Tuesday, January 29
- Rough Draft physically submitted to Mr. Still at the beginning of our exam in class on Wednesday.
- We will perform a peer review in lab on Wednesday.
- You will submit your Final Draft online by Friday.
Let me know how I can help you.
- Kevin Still
Wednesday, January 3, 2018
A Tribute to Jack Ketchum: Your Blog Submissions Should NEVER Look Like This
The New Year often brings the challenge of new-ness. Resolutions beckon we do MORE this or LESS that, to change ourselves even as we struggle to write the correct new year without error. Regardless of what the previous year held, I always pronounce - usually in whatever forum affords me the most praise and affirmation - that I will read more in the next year. Inevitably, I laud my pronouncement with an obnoxiously feux-erudite reading list of titles and authors no one except me cares about, leading to a cricket chirping silence that, also inevitably, leads me right back to my stack of Archie comics in the bathroom. So it goes. Still, I earnestly do want to read more each year. Reading deep and reading well is a craft I hope to hone successfully in my days. This quest leads me to asking for recommendations from those I find on similar literary journeys. We book-nerds are a slim - and growing slimmer - breed. For this reason, in and out of the New Year season, let us bolster one another through our titles and volumes. Hulu, be damned! Netflix, can bite me! Caffeine, ravage me right! And with that, here's a writer I enjoy massively.
Jack Ketchum is difficult to recommend for two reasons. One, Ketchum writes horror. Two, Ketchum writes extreme horror. As you know, if you were to randomly hollar "horror literature" in a crowded coffeeshop these days (or at any time in the past three decades), you'd likely win yourself a treatise from some wide-eyed chatterbox about their favorite Stephen King title, most likely Misery or The Green Mile. If you're in a more ritzy neighborhood, the topic may turn quickly to Dean Koontz. In a really shitty nerd bar, someone will bring up Lovecraft. And God knows where you'd have to be to find yourself pressed against a wall enduring a diatribe on the post-war merits of Peter Straub. (You might wanna get outta there!) The point - which I lost in there somewhere - is that horror literature has it's stalwarts, as all art forms do. And it has those stalwarts, primarily Stephen King, because what Stephen King does, primarily, is rather quaint. King, for the most part, is rarely even remotely grisly or wack-o. And that's good for him. It's the quaint stuff that creates a household name. Even when it comes to horror fiction, most readers prefer to sleep with the light off. Start asking about King's really nasty stuff, "The Library Policeman" or "Rage" or "The Boogeyman", and the chatterbox's eyes will glaze over and the chatter will shift to how oh my gosh, but did you ever see Dolores Clairborne?!
Ketchum has never written a quaint thing in his career. In a Ketchum story, gratuitously Terrible Things happen to average joe people, while somebody in the story - Somebody who represents us, the reader - has to come to grips with this Terrible Thing. In a Ketchum story, the Terrible Thing usually stems from a hand that relishes making Terrible Things happen to people. And, in a Ketchum story, the details of the Terrible Thing are unavoidably significant. Take, for instance, Ketchum's most famous novel, The Girl Next Door. Based on a true story, TGND tells of a young teenage girl in the 60s who is kidnapped by a neighborhood lady, tied up in the basement, and made the whipping post for all the neighborhood boys. The lady of the house oversees all the whipping and humiliation, pushing the limits to new degrees of nasty, and assuring the boys that if anyone tells both they and the girl will endure an even worse punishment. As we know, children are born with the capacity for extreme good and extreme evil, and our jobs as family members and the communal Village is to point those kiddos towards the good. So what happens when the evil is encouraged instead? Well, to say Terrible Things happen to this poor girl is an understatement. So what could possibly be the merit of such a tale? Why either write or read something so despicable?
The answer is simple: The Girl Next Door is told from the perspective of a young neighborhood boy who feels conflicted about everything he's seeing in the basement, as well as his minimal level of participation. He can't sleep. He can't function. He knows what is happening is wrong, but he's terrified to do the right thing. Even at a young age the boy realizes some major aspect of his entire life is in the balance of his consistent decision to remain silent. Not to mention, the boy loves the girl. He has since he first saw her walking in her yellow sundress. But now she's bound and blindfolded. The yellow dress replaced with red stripes on her skin and deep purple bruises. It ain't quaint. The details reveal the full scope of the boys inner turmoil, perhaps even reaching deep into our own reservoir of life-altering action or inaction. As we see from the perspective of the boy who wants to intervene, compassion can be a dangerous thing.
It's here that we find the great hallmark of Jack Ketchum's writing, the thing that brings me back over and over again wishing I could bring other nerdy readers along with me: the scariest thing in Jack Ketchum's world is what happens to the one's we love. And it's for this reason that the details - as non-quaint as they appear at times - matter so greatly. Life pulls no punches. When the sun goes down, the light that guides most people is artificial. How do we approach such people? How do we let anyone we love out of our sight? Religion often seeks to answer such questions, but religion falls short when we allow our own inner light to remain artificial. We can ignore such questions. We can numb ourselves to such questions. Or we can face questions about Terrible Things with the help of artists and storytellers and comedians who take us to dark places to determine the source of our light. Compassion shatters many layers of darkness. So far, Jack Ketchum is my favorite compassionate storyteller.
At the end of this past year, Ketchum released two new titles. The first, Gorilla In My Room, from Cemetery Dance Publications, collects 15 of Ketchum's most recent stories. I've read three other collections of short writings by Ketchum, and this is by far the most diverse. A few pieces are even downright literary and beautifully written. We get Ketchum at his nastiest, as in "Winter's Child" and "Cow" - two stories about the same young lady who happens to be feral and also, well, a cannibal. We see Ketchum try his hand at a Western and a comic zombie story. And we see him deal with issues of child abuse, Alzheimer's, aging, and sexual violence. In each case we, the readers, look into the moment from the perspective of a bystander, usually a family member or loved one, trying to determine how to love their hurting someone well. Compassion can be a complicated thing.
Also in 2017, Ketchum published his third novel with film-maker Lucky McKee (director of May, The Woman, All Cheerleaders Must Die). The Secret Life of Souls, from Pegasus Books, is a short, tight, emotional power-punch of a read. The narrator's perspective shifts between four different members of a single family, including the family dog, which admittedly sounds cheesy except that it just isn't. Ketchum and McKee make it work. Each narrator's voice is unique so that by the half-way point the reader can recognize a new narrator in mere words. The story here follows a young actress, Delia, and her dog, Caity, through the beginning of an exciting career. Obviously, tragedy strikes, and the perspective of Delia and Caity suddenly begins to shift. This becomes evident even to Delia's brother when his perspective begins to shift as well. Exploring the potential depths of relational bonds, Ketchum and McKee avoid Hallmark musical overtures to show that true compassion is ultimately self-sacrificing.
As I said in the beginning, I make the same goal each January to read more. Of course, the goal should encourage quality over quantity: reading more GOOD stuff rather than just stuff. It's for that reason that in 2018 I'm aiming to read everything by Jack Ketchum that I have not already. I know there's some pretty ridiculous stuff in there. Heck, the dude got his start writing sleazy detective stories for men's magazines. But there's also a depth of character and, as I've said repeatedly, compassion in Jack Ketchum's work that I've not found elsewhere in modern pulp fiction. If you need a good quick place to start with Ketchum, I recommend his novel Red. If you're a dog-lover, you'll want to read Red with your four-legged friend nearby. If you've got a strong stomach, try The Woman, his first novel with Lucky McKee. Both titles also have movie versions that are not too bad. Ketchum makes a cameo in each. Otherwise, Ketchum's newest titles, mentioned above, are solid winners. Enjoy the dark . . . you're there already.
Tuesday, December 19, 2017
Best of 2017: A Retrospection in Confusion
2017 proved musically unconventional for me. Through spring and summer, I wallowed in the past more than the present. Thanks to my friend and yours, Kelly Minnis, I discovered Chick Corea and Return to Forever around New Year's and subsequently spent months on the hunt for more jazz fusion - ie. Weather Report, Al Di Meola, Joe Farrell, George Benson’s CTI Recordings (not fusion, but solid elevator luxury), and even swankier Herbie Hancock. I still haven’t listened to all I acquired, which is more confession than boast.
At 2017’s onset, I also happened upon the deliciously essential Getz/Gilberto collaboration, which introduced me to both Stan Getz and Brazilian vocalist Astrud Gilberto, igniting a Bossa Nova kick that naturally bled into an appreciation for music from Mexico when I enrolled in a Spanish class this Fall. I listened incessantly to 2017 releases by Lila Downs, Carla Morrison, and Natalia Lafourcade for audible practice but soon fell genuinely in love with their voices and artistry - especially Lafourcade’s Musas, which is stunning.
Still, betwixt the sonic buzzing, I managed to find a few new releases I hope follow me into next year and beyond. For the list below, I attempted to curate seven titles -in honor of the year- recommendable with a personal referendum of merit. To my surprise, I landed on nine instead. Looking at this list, I’m realizing the year’s loudest track was my own ADD.
1. A Sundae Drive Versailles - I had the pleasure of reviewing Versailles for 979 back in March. The praise I sang then bodes repeating: these Houston garage-rock tyrannosauruses (and all around fine folk) prove the art of making an Album - a singular work of musical and tonal themes - need not be a thing of the past. This was the first record I fell in love with this year. I hope you will, too. Fave track: “Fly South”.
2. Joey McGee Terlingua Taproot - Nepotism alert! Joey McGee is my good friend. We’ve shared many plates at T Jinn’s. But, nepotism aside, when I first heard McGee’s “I’m Gone”, I went from friend to fan by the chorus’ end. Do yourself a favor: find Joey’s next live spot (he’s prolific!) and tip his tip jar, man. Also, request “Long Road Home”, another personal favorite. Those opening lines lay me open every time. Fave tracks: aforementioned.
3. Willie Nelson God's Problem Child - Willie needed a solid follow-up to 2016’s retread sleeper Summertime, but I didn’t expect Willie to deliver a goodbye letter. Damn! I’m not ready for that day. But, according to this record, Willie’s made his peace and, as GPC’s primary tone suggests, he’s as surprised as any of us he’s still around. Even the cover - Willie’s weathered profile washed in red - harkens back to 1974’s Phases and Stages, the concept album that proved “Shotgun Willie” was not some forgettable fairground spectacle. At 84, Willie sounds strong. Resolute even. Like he’s got several records still blazin’ up in him. But, as Tom Petty so boldly declared in October: no one knows the hour. I miss Willie already. Fave tracks: “Old Timer” and, Willie’s tribute to Merle, “He Won’t Ever Be Gone”.
4. John Mark McMillan Mercury and Lightning - No other album on this list commanded such a dance with my affections as this one. On one hand, McMillan infused a poppiness to M&L that recalls all the reasons Springsteen lost fans in the 80s. Still, when songs like “Wilderlove” and “Enemy, love” and “Death In Reverse” and “No Country” work in their talons, you’re stuck. These songs feel impenetrable: earworms that just won’t quit. And I’m glad. In these songs, McMillan reminds me of things I hope to never forget. Fave tracks: check above.
5. Mon Laferte La Trenza - Stop what you’re doing and cue up this Chilean rock goddess’ “Mi Buen Amor” or “Amarrame” or “No Te Fumes Mi Mariguana” and experience how Mon Laferte so easily absconded with my Spanish practice and replaced it with full-blown fanaticism. I’m driving around belting out lines I haven’t even translated yet! So be it. I’m just praying Laferte finds her way to these Estados Unidos soon. Fave tracks: you should be rocking them already.
6. Bell Witch Mirror Reaper - Now we’ve hit the bummer side of the list. I also reviewed Mirror Reaper for 979 in November. My primary note welcomes repeating: everything about this record appears to be a gimmick. One song. 83 minutes. Two distinct movements of slow, brooding, funeral doom guitars and drums and organs with vocals from a recently deceased former bandmate piped in for tributary reasons. It sounds almost corny, I admit. But sitting through the entirety of MR -as I have half a dozen times- is a beautiful experience. (“Beautiful” in the way Darren Aronofsky films used-to-be beautiful.) The second half, starting right at the 49 minute mark where it gets all ambient and drony, is hand-down my favorite record of 2017. I’d pay too many dollars to witness Bell Witch perform this album live. My bday is in September. Feel free to help me make that happen. Fave track: duh.
7. Amenra Mass VI - Here’s some doomy, sludgey, post-something metal from Belgium that - like Bell Witch - perfectly assimilates all the things I take pills not to feel and then pieces that scattered grand suckery together into bizarrely beautiful chunks of meditative blister-gaze that I cannot get enough of. Crap. I love everything about this record, even that one dude’s off-putting razor-gargling squealy vocals. It’s a delightful piece of genuflect-able art that makes me want to be better person . . . someday. Fave track: “A Solitary Reign”.
8. Bison You Are Not The Ocean - After all those feelings culled and coddled by Bell Witch and Amenra, I need a swift kick to the groin to boot me out the door and back into the wild. So I appreciate an angry, nail-spitter of a record that reminds us that heavy metal is still a valuable daily resource. It’s like corn: we can utilize its energy more than we realize. Bison’s new record -sludging straight down from Vancouver- is all that beautiful corn for me. Fave tracks: yes. I even dig those weird little flutey bits at the end of “Tantrum”.
9. Power Trip Nightmare Logic - Same as Bison, but this groin kick portaled to us all the way from 1987. There’s not one bad thing about this record except that it ends. I recently saw Power Trip open for Cannibal Corpse. DO NOT MISS POWER TRIP LIVE! Or this record. Start with the single, “Executioner’s Tax”, and then sample a deeper cut like “Waiting Around to Die”, which opens with a bizarre synthy-esque digitized bass loop before ripping into lightning fast riffage - a total of 1.5 minutes of intro on a four and a half minute track. I like them odds. Fave tracks: all of Manifest Decimation, but Nightmare Logic is a solid follow-up.
A few artists released 2017 albums I wanted more time with - Enslaved, Converge, Wode, Cafe Tacuba, Lea Ann Womack, Filthy Friends come to mind - but two ears can travel only so far in a year. Better luck in 2018. See you there.
Tuesday, December 5, 2017
Bell Witch's MIRROR REAPER: An Album Review
Let’s get technicalities out of the way. Mirror Reaper marks the third full-length album from Seattle doom metal duo Bell Witch. Released October 20 from Profound Lore Records, Bell Witch delivers the entire 83 minutes of Mirror Reaper’s duration through a single track. (For fans of Sleep, that’s 20 minutes longer and one track less than 2003’s Dopesmoker - not that anyone’s suggesting a measuring contest here. I’m just offering context. Not to mention, veteran Sleep and Neurosis producer Billy Andersen captains the Mirror Reaper helm, putting this album into the realm of modern classics even at its inception.) The technicalities here are worth getting aside as they comprise the least interesting details about this record.
Mirror Reaper’s backstory as eulogy is key. Recorded in response to the passing of founding member and drummer Adrian Guerra, Mirror Reaper works as a single track split over two distinct movements: the agonized “As Above” and the resurgent “So Below”. Bell Witch’s current line-up, Dylan Desmond (bass, vocals) and Jesse Shreibman (drums, organ, vocals), confessed unique intentions for Mirror Reaper on their Bandcamp page: “In love and respect to [Guerra’s] memory, we reserved an important yet brief section in the song for him that features unused vocal tracks from our last album. This specific movement serves as a conceptual turn in the piece, or point of reflection.” From a band who traditionally focuses their narratives on ghosts - look to 2015’s beautifully epic Four Phantoms - in order to explore perplexing and uncomfortable boundary lines between life and death, Guerra’s posthumous vocals offer a turn - right at the 51 minute mark - that feel far more tangible than merely conceptual.
Those who commit to Mirror Reaper will find its uniqueness not bound to format. After repeated listens, Mirror Reaper, for me, becomes more compelling, more complex, even beautiful. Spending time here is not difficult. The album holds and demands attention, moving in places both unexpected but grossly familiar to anyone who’s experienced grief. Bell Witch musically recalls a painful truth: grief takes time. It requires process. It brings our entire spirit to a grinding halt and then kneads us into something new that we never imagined. Perhaps something stronger. Perhaps enlightened. We can’t know until we endure and emerge. In that context, Mirror Reaper - this 83 minute doom symphony - offers a snapshot of such endurance. Nothing on this record is rushed. No one is hurried. Music builds and falls. Vocals rise and fade. Single notes simmer, drifting slowly into larger, darker expanses of chasm deep echoes, and this beyond our awareness. We find ourselves suddenly in new territory - “a new shore” as Guerra sings. Meanwhile, cymbals crash like broken water while bass lines swim twisted through currents of, initially, anger and despair, until eventually giving way - prompted by hymn-like layered organ swells - to something lighter, something akin to peace, perhaps hope. How ironic that Mirror Reaper, a record about an actual death, ends at the opposite of doom.
Grief’s full portrait is here. A sun setting. A darkness ruling. But then a sun reappearing. Bell Witch reminds listeners - by closing and pulling back these curtains - that, sure, we can keep our eyes closed, but the sun will reappear. In that sense, Mirror Reaper is an 83 minute exercise in emerging.
Thursday, September 29, 2016
READ 0304: Watch Billy Collins.
Find out a few things about this guy. He's one of the best at his game. I'd read this poem before and totally missed the humor in it until I saw this video and heard Collins' voice. Enjoy.
Wednesday, February 3, 2016
Baroness PURPLE : Album Review
With each new release since their 2007 debut, Red, Baroness has built a reputation for publishing better songs than albums. On their sophomore follow-up, Blue (2009), Baroness attempted a darker, heavier sound, blending influences of sludge and some kinda grind-type-thing that felt like a cartoonish sidekick to Mastodon's Leviathon. With Yellow & Green (2012), Baroness released two albums worth of slower, more emotive, methodically blended hard-rock that left most listeners wondering if Y&G was a conceptual project. The lack of cohesiveness across the packaged individual records, not to mention the entire project, firmly answer the concept question, but so did the meandering musical rabbit trails that seemed to have no damn clue where certain songs wanted to go. How could listeners plant both feet into Y&G when the band - or maybe their producers - had not? Y&G is not a complete disaster; nevertheless, a double-album offering four of five good tracks is hardly worth admission price.
Still, I am a Baroness fan, and I enjoy aspects of all their albums. For this reason, I was glad to spend time with Purple, released December 18, 2015 from the band's own label, Abraxan Hymns. Purple negates the old Baroness reputation: from cover to cover, with minor exceptions, Purple is a damn good album. Also, cohesively speaking, Purple works as a concept piece. It's impossible to fully engage Purple without considering the 2012 bus-crash that injured two members into early retirement and nearly stole guitarist / vocalist / artist John Baizely's ability to play and paint. After the crash, Baizley stated on the Official Baroness webpage: "I can say, after nearly 6 weeks of reflection, that I feel more resolute and passionate about our music than ever. I have come to realize the importance of time in this particular equation, that is, I have none to waste and none to spare." This urgency marks a primary hallmark of Purple's success.
Purple opens explosively with "Morningstar", satisfying the band's Mastodon crush. "Dry yours tears, my darling / There's a pistol-whipped look in your eyes / The captain was gentle / He left you alive." Baizley charges with an immediacy he's not yet possessed. His vocals contain greater diversity, even in a single track here, than he's previously challenged of himself. That being said, Baizley, at times on Purple, trades early Baroness screams for a more vulnerable singer-songwriter crooning that, even if it's not pretty, offers an authenticity that reminds listeners of what birthed this album. Such rawness can be heard on "Shock Me" (poppy finger-snapper) and "Kerosene" (cheesy hi-hat titter-tat opener bleeds into symphonic gang-chant: "When I am done / I'll lay in the sun". Super nice.). These solid tracks are unfortunately followed by Purple's weakest spot: the instrumental "Fugue", which invalidates its denotation while also detracting from the conceptual impact thus far. Odd choice.
The other high point of Purple is the new percussive line-up. Sebastian Thomas on drums and Nick Jost on bass together add a layered foundation beneath most tracks. Thomas' punk quick roots surface during particular intros and outros, calling listeners back to his bizarre complexity in the track's body. Jost's background as a jazz bassist is found in his improvisational nature. More than a repetitive rhythm keeper, Jost stomps around the track adding emotional transitions between various hooks and breaks. Tracks like "Try to Disappear" and "The Iron Bell" showcase Thomas and Jost's benefit to the band.
Still, the guttural punch of Purple lands in track six, just over the half-way point. "Chlorine and Wine" is Baroness at their best. A simple, pretty drum and guitar instrumental opener erupts into a battered catharsis of thickly layered riffs and crashes topped with Baizley's Walt Whitman-urgent "yawp." Then verse two. Jost's bass line opens wide. Verse three. Then Baizley and Peter Adam's dual layered guitar solo, punctuated by hi-hat ellipses and Jost's piano interlude. And then the band's gang-chant finale: "Please / Don't lay me down / Under the rocks where I've found / My place in the ground / Home for the fathers and sons." This is a fucking good track. Goose-bumps and fist-pumps from open to end. Religious music. Healing music. A song wielded as a weapon and tear-gagging belly-romp laugh in the face of death. Not yet, sucker. There's more to be done. And these guys are doing it.
Sunday, September 20, 2015
The Sword's HIGH COUNTRY - A Review
Experimentation and exploration in music are a must. God forbid current artists be met with the same outcry Bob Dylan received in 1965 upon releasing Bringing It All Back Home. Dylan's fans couldn't fathom their acoustic god going electric, and they booed him from the stands. Without musical experimentation the Beatles would have never cut The White Album, The Beastie Boys would have never gone hip-hop, and Kanye wouldn't have cut the forgettable 808s and Heartbreak on his way to My Beautiful Dark Twisted Fantasy. The case of Kanye proves timely as he possibly released 808s and Heartbreak a bit early in the experimentation process. Kanye may have wanted to hold all that down until he landed on something more profound. The same can be said of The Sword's newest release, High Country.
Bless The Sword's hearts: High Country is a boring record. The greatest thing to be said of High Country is its invitation to return to The Sword's earlier, heavier records. Unfortunately, a chronological listen through The Sword's discography attests their continual movement from darker, old-fashion doomy stoner sound, as on Age of Winters (2006), to more democratically commercial, southern hard rock, as can be heard to some degree already on Warp Riders (2010) and certainly, with an added tinge of blues guitar, on Apocryphon (2012). By this year's High Country, The Sword has morphed into a full-on non-metal pseudo-hard-rock southern jam band (trumpets?!), which, again, would be fine if they achieved more than an uneven tribute album to the '70s bands - less Sabbath and Sleep, more ZZ Top and Steve Miller - they've genuflected upon these past three years.
Nevertheless, High Country is not without it's high points. "Mist and Shadows" opens slowly on the rhythm of high-hats and field crickets, then evolves into the strongest blues riffs on the entire album. It's a sweaty track full of swagger and space synth, featuring J.D. Cronise's strongest vocal moments on the record. This bleeds into the short synth instrumental, "Agartha", that feels more giallo soundtrack than 70s southern pride. "Suffer No Fools" might be the stand out track, combining The Sword's classic thick, heavy crunches with bluesy string-bending solos, all of this propped against a wall of solid 70s synth. The track closes with a crowd in uproarious applause, as if the band knew this was the track holding the entire album together. "Suffer No Fools" reveals The Sword at the height of their experimentation, holding their gaze toward future potentials while keeping one foot firmly planted in their signature sound. "Turned To Dust", one of the album's final tracks, steals too much from AC/DC's "Hells Bells" in the opening to not raise eyebrows. Even after the really great tracks previously mention, "Turned To Dust" is an unfortunate closing track, reminding listeners that High Country reads more like a term paper leaning too heavily on credible sources rather than a bold, brash manifesto proclaiming where a legendary band could go next.
Thursday, November 6, 2014
Wednesday, October 1, 2014
Oculus: A Film Review and Critical Response
Mike Flanagan's Oculus (2013) tells a modern day fairy-tale about sibling commitment, magical mirrors, and the possessive quality of memory and imagination through the vehicle of my favorite horror film of the year. I enjoyed this movie, first of all, because I prefer movies that tell really good stories, and Oculus, at its core, is a really good story. Secondly, I like stories about the endurance of family commitments, about families conjuring the courage and determination to fight their demons together. Far too many movies and television shows today feature dysfunctional families, usually for comedic value. And while I do often laugh along, I personally no longer belong to a dysfunctional family. My wife and I are committed and determined to wage life's obstacles together, and I appreciate the opportunity to see stories of families doing the same thing. Lastly, I have so far been unfamiliar with the acting talents of Kaytee Sackhoff (who plays the mother, Marie Russell), as well as Karen Gillan (who plays heroine Kaylie Russell). I've since learned that Sackhoff and Gillan have each had extensive runs on various TV shows. Their performances here blew me away. I'll be looking for more work from both actresses.
I do want to disagree with NY Times film critic Ben Kenigsberg on three points. First, he said that Oculus was "a derivative but efficient chiller". I disagree with the idea that Oculus was merely "efficient", which carries a negative connotation and ranks this film among the average releases of the year. No, I found Oculus to be one of the more triumphant films of the year for reasons I've already listed above. Kenigsberg also uses negative language such as "modest", "fundamental", and "stiff acting" to describe the production and performance values of Oculus. Again, I found the storytelling here rich and the performances beyond noteworthy. Kenigsberg appears to be critiquing films out of either his comfort zone or his preferred genre. Either way, get him back in front of the buddy-comedies and action-flicks he probably enjoys more. I'm already looking forward to including Oculus in my DVD library.
Wednesday, August 28, 2013
Maria Bamford's Ask Me About My New God - An Album Review
In recent Louis CK specials, Louis has helped us laugh at the awkwardness of divorce and the grossness of narcissism. Patton Oswalt points fingers at
parenthood and religion, while Sarah Silverman stays fairly well focused on
race relations and bed-wetting. Mike Birbiglia’s most recent album actually made
his sleepwalking disorder interesting, heartbreaking, and oddly hilarious. Tig
Notaro, in an unexpected turn at the Largo Theater last year, brought her
breast cancer into light and reiterated how vital comedy can be to coping with
personal disaster. If comedy accomplishes anything profound or great, it’s
this: it teaches us to laugh in the face of unpleasantry, even despair.
And
there’s a good chance no one has touched as closely to the void as Maria
Bamford. Those familiar with Bamford know her comedy revolves primarily around
her bi-polar disorder and her debilitating paranoia. Those unfamiliar with
Bamford may not be prepared for her unique approach to comedy, which relies exclusively
on character voices, random internal dialogues, and winding explorations of her
family’s inability to understand Maria as a fragile teetering being. (In fact,
Bamford’s family is extremely supportive of her comedy, as her parents declared
by serving as the sole audience for Bamford’s SPECIAL SPECIAL SPECIAL recorded
earlier this year in their living room.)
As a huge
fan of Maria Bamford, I think her newest record – Ask Me About My New God – is
her best yet. It’s tough for me not to use words like “genius” or “masterpiece”
or “more inspiring than a Soul Surfer / Dead Poets mash-up” when discussing
this record, so I’ll just say it’s really super crazy awesome amazing. Here Bamford
further tackles her mental instability, as well as her inability to function
within her family and society, but she also addresses (at length) her suicidal
tendencies and temptations. She even offers profound reasons to stay alive,
such as spite. This is not the stuff – depression, anxiety, mental illness,
suicide – one expects from the year’s best comedy record, but Bamford is a
brave one, revealing all her unwanted thoughts without reserve. As really good
comedy should do.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)